Aidan Mayo vs Daniel Milavsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Mayo has been winning 46.24% of points on their second serve in the last six months, while Milavsky slightly outperforms them with a 48.24% rate. Could second serve strength determine the match's outcome? Perhaps, since Milavsky has a slight edge here.
• On return games, Mayo captures 46.77% of points on the opponent's second serve, whereas Milavsky excels with a 53.06% success rate. When it comes to first serve returns, Mayo leads 28.49% to Milavsky’s 23.99%, suggesting a competitive return game divide.
• Under pressure, Milavsky saves breakpoints at a 54.27% rate, outperforming Mayo's 47.44%, indicating Milavsky's resilience in difficult situations.
• In the past year, Mayo achieves a 50% match win rate, but Milavsky impresses with 77.78%, showing stronger overall recent form.
• Mayo performs best on hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Milavsky excels on indoor hard courts with an 80% win rate, hinting at surface preferences that might influence match outcomes.
• Over the last year, Mayo has mostly played at the Challenger/ITF level, winning 47.92% of matches. In contrast, Milavsky has been successful at the Futures/ITF level, winning 82.76%, showing relative strength in their respective competitions.
• Despite facing tougher opponents with an average rank of 291, Mayo's deciding set win rate is 38%, compared to Milavsky's superior 71% even against lower-ranked opponents, indicating Milavsky’s ability to close matches effectively.
• In terms of seizing breakpoint opportunities, Mayo has a higher conversion rate of 32.56% compared to Milavsky’s 27.91%, suggesting Mayo might capitalize better when given the chance.

Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):

Mayo and Milavsky present contrasting styles and strengths coming into this match. With Mayo slightly more adept at converting break points, there is a possibility for surprises during critical points in the match.

However, Milavsky's greater success on the return and in deciding sets shows a robust ability to perform under pressure. Their excellent performance in Futures tournaments compared to Mayo's challenges at higher levels suggests they might have the upper hand in crucial moments.

Considering recent forms, match-winning percentages, and critical game-point statistics, Milavsky appears better positioned to emerge victorious, with a likelihood of leveraging their advantages significantly more than Mayo.